This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 2324–2338, doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.232
Figure 1: Three-dimensional geometric model of fluid in a micro-dimple array and a single micro-dimple unit.
Figure 2: The computational domain.
Figure 3: The division of the fluid domain in the micro-dimple unit.
Figure 4: Variations of the dimensionless average film carrying force and the computing time.
Figure 5: The typical meshed model of a micro-dimple unit.
Figure 6: Pressure distribution on the upper wall of the lubricant in the micro-dimple unit.
Figure 7: Pressure distribution of the cross-sectional area of the lubricant in a micro-dimple unit.
Figure 8: The pressure distribution on the upper wall for (a) Re = 5, (b) Re = 50 and (c) Re = 250.
Figure 9: Effect of Reynolds number on the pressure distribution on the middle section of the micro-dimple un...
Figure 10: Effect of texture density and aspect ratio on the dimensionless average film carrying force for (a) ...
Figure 11: Variation of the fluid velocity in the micro-dimple unit with (a) λ = 0.025, (b) λ = 0.075, (c) λ =...
Figure 12: Effect of texture density and aspect ratio on the dimensionless average film shear force for (a) Re...
Figure 13: Effect of texture density and aspect ratio on the friction coefficient for (a) Re = 5, (b) Re = 50 ...
Figure 14: Effect of Reynolds number on (a) the dimensionless average film carrying force, (b) the dimensionle...
Figure 15: Effect of Reynolds number on the optimum texture density and optimum aspect ratio.